It’s exceedingly uncommon to see a VR software program startup transition to creating {hardware}, not to mention first rate {hardware}. However that’s precisely what Bigscreen—creators of the long-running social VR theater app of the identical identify—has completed with its upcoming Past headset.
Bigscreen has clearly focused PC VR fanatics who’re keen to pay for the perfect {hardware} they’ll get their arms on. And with main gamers like Meta and HTC focusing closely on standalone headsets, Bigscreen Past might show to be the most suitable choice they’ll discover any time quickly.
The corporate has got down to make a headset that’s not simply higher than what’s on the market, however one which’s a lot smaller too. And whereas it stays to be seen if the headset will hit all the fitting notes, my preliminary hands-on exhibits plainly the corporate is aware of what it’s doing on the subject of constructing a VR headset.
Bigscreen Past Specs | |
Decision | 2,560 × 2,560 (6.5MP) per-eye microOLED (2x, RGB stripe) |
Pixels Per-degree (claimed) | 28 |
Refresh Fee | 75Hz, 90Hz |
Lenses | Tri-element pancake |
Subject-of-view (claimed) | 93°H × 90°V |
Optical Changes | IPD (fastened, personalized per buyer) eye-relief (fastened, personalized per facepad) |
IPD Adjustment Vary | 58–72mm (fastened, single IPD worth per gadget) |
Connectors | DisplayPort 1.4, USB 3.0 (2x) |
Accent Ports | USB-C (1x) |
Cable Size | 5m |
Monitoring | SteamVR Monitoring 1.0 or 2.0 (exterior beacons) |
On-board Cameras | None |
Enter | SteamVR Monitoring controllers |
On-board Audio | None |
Optionally available Audio | Audio Strap accent, USB-C audio output |
Microphone | Sure (2x) |
Cross-through view | No |
Weight | 170–185g |
MSRP | $1,000 |
MSRP (with monitoring & controllers) | $1,580 |
Customized-made
Bigscreen is constructing one thing distinctive, fairly actually—each Past headset comes with a custom-made facepad. And this isn’t a ‘select certainly one of three choices’ scenario, Bigscreen has a glossy app that walks consumers by the method of capturing a 3D scan of their face so the corporate can create a unique facepad that conforms to every particular buyer.
And it actually makes a distinction. The very first thing that Bigscreen CEO Darshan Shankar confirmed me throughout a demo of the Past headset was the distinction between my private facepad (which the corporate created for me previous to our meetup) and another person’s facepad. The distinction was immediately apparent; the place mine match towards my face virtually like two related puzzle-pieces, the opposite facepad awkwardly disagreed with my face in numerous locations. Whereas I’ve acknowledged for a very long time that completely different facial topology from person-to-person is an actual consideration for VR headsets, this made me admire much more how vital the variations will be.

Shankar says the custom-fit facepad is a vital a part of making such a small headset. It ensures not solely that the headset is as snug as it may be, but in addition the consumer’s eyes are precisely the place they’re purported to be with regard to the lenses. For a headset like Past, which makes use of excessive magnification pancake optics with a small candy spot, that is particularly essential. And, as Shankar convincingly demonstrated by shining a flashlight throughout the headset whereas I used to be carrying it, the custom-fit facepad means completely no exterior mild will be seen from inside.
And the {custom} facepad isn’t the one method every headset is dialed in for every particular buyer; as a substitute of losing weight and house with the mechanics for an IPD adjustment, the headset ships with certainly one of 15 fastened IPD distances, starting from 58–72mm. The corporate selects the IPD primarily based on the identical face scan that permits them to make the {custom} facepad. And given the dimensions of the Past headset, there’s no method that glasses will match inside; fortunately the corporate can even promote magnetically connected prescription inserts for many who want them, as much as −10 diopter.
Diving In
With my {custom} facepad simply snapped onto the headset with magnets, it was time to dive into VR.
The baseline model of the $1,000 Bigscreen Past headset has a easy comfortable strap, which I threw over the again of my head and tightened to style. I felt I needed to put on the strap very excessive on the again of my head for maintain; Shankar says an optionally available top-strap will likely be accessible, which ought to permit me to put on the rear strap in a decrease place.

As I placed on the headset I discovered myself sitting in a darkish Bigscreen theater surroundings, and the very very first thing I seen was the stellar darks and wealthy colours which are because of the headset’s OLED shows. The second factor I seen was there was no sound! That’s as a result of the baseline model of the headset doesn’t have on-board audio, so I nonetheless needed to placed on a pair of headphones after the headset was donned.
Whereas the baseline headset lacks on-board audio, Bigscreen is providing a $100 ‘Audio Strap‘, which is a inflexible headstrap with built-in audio system. As somebody who actually values inflexible straps and on-board audio, I’m glad to see this as an choice—for me it will be the apparent selection. Sadly the corporate wasn’t able to demo the Audio Strap.
Shankar toured me round a handful of VR environments that confirmed off the headset’s 2,560 × 2,560 (6.5MP) per-eye shows, which provided a stage of readability much like that of Varjo’s $2,000 Aero headset, however with a smaller notably field-of-view (Bigscreen claims 90°H × 93°V).
On many current-gen headsets like Quest 2 you may’t fairly see the person traces of the screen-door impact, however it’s nonetheless clear that it’s there in mixture. Whereas the Past headset isn’t ‘retina decision’ there’s basically no proof of any screen-door impact. All the things seems to be actually sharp. This was greatest demonstrated once I ran round in Half-Life: Alyx and the sport felt prefer it had immediately upgraded graphics in comparison with a headset like Valve’s Index.
There may be, nonetheless, some persistence blurring and glare. Shankar overtly demonstrated how the brightness of the show immediately pertains to the extent of persistence. Whereas there’s some noticeable persistence on the default brightness, when overdriving the show’s brightness the persistence turns into fully insufferable. The reverse is true; turning the brightness down under the default cuts the persistence down noticeably. Whereas it will be good if the default brightness had much less persistence, a minimum of customers will be capable of commerce brightness for decrease persistence primarily based on their particular desire.